Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Kurt_Canning_2004 Date: Sep 25, 2004 2:57am
Forum: election_2004 Subject: Abortion, a choice of morality?

Abortion is a very touchy issue to many people, not just the US, but the whole world. To say a woman has no choice is wrong, but to let it get out of control is wrong.

I believe in Abortions up to the second stage of abortion. This is the stage before the child develops a heart-beat and begins kicking and etc.. This is fair and can be agreed with by most people. Most people dont like the idea of taking a woman's rights away, but they equally disapprove of killing a baby, I try to moderate it to fit everyone's needs and wants.

However there is a place I put my foot down, If a woman is raped abortions will always be allowed. That is not the woman's fault at all and should not be looked at like it is. All a woman can do to prevent rape is try and defend herself, I dont think you can blame her by being forced into things.

Another thing I would like to talk about is Incest Abortions. How can you justify that..killing someone because you thought you should have sex with your own relatives...I understand it isnt a good thing and can do harm to a child in the long run..but its not the childs fault.

Finally, pregnancies that endanger the mothers life are justifiable in my book. I would rather keep a life and prevent one, then to lose one to start a new one..say this woman is an important person like a doctor or scientist or even a government official, I think the living need to come before the pre-born, but thats just my 2 cents.

I myself do not support abortion, would not encourage my wife to have an abortion, nor would I encourage anyone to have an abortion. However it's wrong for government to be able to tell a woman what to do with her body. However I think it is murder after the second trimester..so thats where I draw the line

VOTE CANNING-MARTIN 2004!

PS. I won back the Centrist Equality Party in a unanimous court order. http://centristequality.tripod.com/







This post was modified by Kurt_Canning_2004 on 2004-09-25 09:57:24

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: jackgrimes2004 Date: Sep 25, 2004 2:01am
Forum: election_2004 Subject: Re: Abortion, a choice of morality?

Actually there's nothing wrong with abortion at any stage as the child doesn't even begin to understand what it is or, even that it is until it reaches the age of reason, at about three years of age.

VOTE FASCIST 2004!!!!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Kurt_Canning_2004 Date: Sep 25, 2004 2:53am
Forum: election_2004 Subject: Re: Abortion, a choice of morality?

Neither do mentally challenged people, so is it right to kill them?

Vote Canning-Marton 2004!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: jackgrimes2004 Date: Sep 28, 2004 1:20am
Forum: election_2004 Subject: Re: Abortion, a choice of morality?

I didn't say that, nor did I mean to imply it. I merely point out that, with the human population growing so rapidly and the limited amount of living space on the planet, we need to use every means we have to restrict and limit human procreation.

Now, as I see it, this must be done not only for the survival of humanity but also for the good of the planet.

You know we wouldn't even be focusing on this topic if people would only practice safe sex?

VOTE FASCIST 2004!!!!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: mdstdnt0056 Date: Oct 16, 2004 12:39am
Forum: election_2004 Subject: Re: Abortion, a choice of morality?

Whether or not it's a choice of morality, it's a poor way to decide who to vote for this November.

Kerry, while pro-choice, would not do anything to make abortions more available (i.e. repeal the partial birth abortion legislation).

Bush, while pro-life, would probably not do much to make abortions less available. Why? Particularly because he has had four years to do just that (for two of these years, he's had majorities in both the House and Senate), yet the most he could was ban partial birth abortions, a rarely-used procedure whose banning will hardly make a dent in the total number of abortions per year. If he were serious about abortion, he'd have done something major while he could. He's said he knows it will be a close race this November, which means he acknowledges he might not win and might not have a chance to pass to take further pro-life action. Even if he is elected, there's no guarantee he'll his Congress will ever be as receptive as they are now.

In summary, Bush has kept the issue on the back burner, and I doubt he'll ever bring it up to the front. Kerry won't do anything to change the status quo. Regardless of who's elected, little will be done about abortion in the next four years, so using abortion as one's primary argument to support one candidate over another is a poor strategy.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Kurt_Canning_2004 Date: Oct 17, 2004 5:30am
Forum: election_2004 Subject: Re: Abortion, a choice of morality?

Well I agree with you completely. Bush and Kerry will not do anything about abortion, and it is a relativly small issue. However something has to be done about abortion. That is what I intend to do to maybe silence the protests of both sides and bring peace between the sides.

I like to steer my campaign more toward domestic issues, because they affect the people more so than anything else. If elected I would do something about abortion, I will promise you that

Vote Canning-Martin 2004!
www.kurtcanning2004.cjb.net
www.centrist-equality-party.cjb.net

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: jackgrimes2004 Date: Oct 18, 2004 8:02am
Forum: election_2004 Subject: Re: Abortion, a choice of morality?

What about "morning after pills" many are safe and harmless? We could introduce more products of this kind from France and Germany, where regulations aren't so strict, if the FDA would
approve them.

Also, we could extend secrecy to teens, allowing them to hide their condition from everyone, even their parents. This would encourage still more abortions, would it not?

Vote Fascist 2004!

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)